by hkooijman » 28 April 2021, 17:22
I computed the first ratio incorrectly and as a result the product slate changed. I corrected the calculation and saw the flow ratio's needed to be 7.85 and 0.17. I then noticed that the rich liquid feed to the low pressure column was changing its quality (i.e. the ratio of L/V). This is because I had assigned it a fixed duty, whereas that should actually be the duty to run the argon column's condenser. Therefore, I added an energy stream that ensures that the duty of the argon column is used as input for the heat the rich liquid feed experiences. This ensures that the flowsheet converges now over the range of 10 to 100 kg/s (I still advise you to not make the step changes too large). Notice that when you lower the flows the heat loss the columns experience should be adapted correspondingly as well, in order to keep results the same. This matters when you reduce the flow rates, and be aware that each column has a heat loss assigned to it. When you reduce the flows it is better to assign the heat losses first to the lower values expected. The new file for the ASU is now online for download.
H